Business Law Case Study

Business laws deal with the set of laws that are highly functional in
resolving the domestic or foreign matters of business through a series of
official materials, meetings, and other commercial agreements. Business
lawyers help their clients glide through the allegation and other relevant
matters of trade with their in-depth knowledge of the commercial laws. A
business law student without properly dealing and understanding of the
intricacies of business law case study would not be able to help their
clients in future.

The main problem of commercial laws, are that it is subjected to the
jurisdiction lines that ensures that every business law differ its
neighboring country. A good case study writing services takes care of
the relevant factors and mechanism of law as it is very important to
know the location of the university in where the student studies
because law is not universal and it certainly affects the marks of
business law homework if the student gets the jurisdiction wrong.

Business Law Case Study Examples With Solutions
Here are examples of business laws from a variety of legal scenarios.
All these examples have been taken from actual case studies given to
students at legal schools. Before we try to answer them, here are few
tips which you must remember. They are:
Always remember that the purpose of writing a legal case study is to
put briefly the complex and tangled legal materials which are available
on a case so that the readers can quickly scan through them.

Question- Case Study- 1-
Margaret owned an antique store that specialised in rare porcelain dolls. When she
opened the business in 1989, it was at a shop in an eastern suburb of Melbourne. In
1999
she started to advertise on the Internet and by 2006 the business had grown to the point
where she needed help to keep the business going. After a family discussion one night at
the kitchen table in July 2006, it was agreed that Margaret would probably keep the
business going for another couple of years and then retire. Emily, her youngest daughter
and aged 16, would work in the shop as long as was needed and in return, she would
receive any unsold dolls. When Margaret retired at the end of 2009, she decided that she
would give the unsold stock to charity and they could auction it and keep the proceeds.
Advise Emily.

Answer- Case Study- 1-
Issues: There was an oral agreement between Margret and Emily but at the
time of entering into agreement Emily was a minor i.e. under the age of 18
years. Basically there are two issues involved in it, first whether Emily can
confirm the agreement between them as a contract after attaining majority?
Second whether Emily has the right to bind Margret under the agreement
between them.
Law: A contract with a Minor can be valid, void or voidable at the option of the
minor. [Business Law, 2009] The contract entered by the minor for the benefits
of service paid by him is a valid contract. A minor has a right to repudiate
contract after attaining the age of majority and escape from the liability or can
reaffirm that.

Application: Here, Margaret agreed to give Emily the unsold stocks against the
service provided by her but at the time of retirement she announces to give the
unsold stocks in charity. Emily can make Margret to comply with the terms of
agreement as it was a legally enforceable agreement. It is only Emily who can
make the contract void after attaining the age of majority. But this option can
be exercised by her only during her minority once she attained the age of
majority. Once she does nothing during her minority to repudiate the contract,
she can not make it void after that. [Mance, 2011]
Conclusion: Therefore in this situation, in 2009 the agreement became legally
enforceable and Emily has all the rights as a party to the contract, so she can
bring a suit in the court of Law against Margret to take all the benefits.

Question- Case Study- 2-
Richard, an impoverished university student, and his millionaire father enter into an
• arrangement where Richard agrees that he will keep the front- and backyards of the
• family property mowed, and he will ‘do a bit’ to keep the gardens looking tidy. In return,
• his father agrees to pay him a weekly allowance of $200. His father had previously
used a
• garden contractor to do the job and paid him $350. They live on a one-hectare
property,
• and the mowing alone takes half a day a week. After four weeks, Richard’s father tells
him
• that he can’t afford to pay $200 a week. He says that Richard should be doing the
work
• for nothing, as it is the responsibility of the whole family to look after the property;
• besides, he says, Richard is getting free board and lodging. Advise Richard.

Answer- Case Study- 2
Issues: The agreement between Richard and his father comes under the
category of social or domestic contracts. Issue involved here is about the
validity of contract between Richard and his Father and Richard claim his
money from him?
Law: For any agreement to be legally binding the parties must have the
intention to create a legal relationship. This is the third essential ingredient of a
valid contract. But the Law presumes that the domestic or social agreements
do not have this intent to legal bind it. However it can be presented before the
court that there exists the intention of legally binding each other but it is very
difficult to reverse the presumption of law. [ Asif, 2009] It is also presumed that
the domestic contract between parent and child is not intended to be legally
binding and it was held in the case of Jones v Padvattan.
Conclusion: Therefore Richard is entitled for the payment for his labor of four
weeks, he can move to the court of law to enforce his right against his father

But the situation will be different when parties express their clear intention of
making the contract legally binding enter into the contract.
Application: Richard agreed to mow the front land and garden of his house and
in return his father will give him $ 200. This amount may be treated as the
consideration of the contract between them. The work needed much time and
labor. Richard relying on the statement of his father started doing the work. In
contractual terms he was performing his part of contract and after four weeks of
his labor his father refused to pay the agreed amount of $200. As held by many
the honorable courts in many contractual cases related to performance of the
contract that the person who proceeded with his part of performance must not
be deprived from getting his reward. Such as, in Hoeing v Issac and Bolton v
Mahadeva, where the court ordered the defendants to pay the amount for their
substantial performance. [Wallis, 2008]

ContactUS
Phone Number -
AUS - +61-3-4000-0033, UK - +44-121-285-4112, US - +1-515-393-6211
NZ - +64-98880721, UAE - +971-8000320360
Australia - Melbourne - 266/189 Queen St, melbourne VIC 3000,Australia
UK - London - 60 WindsorAvenue, London SW19 2RR, United Kingdom
US - NewYork - 447 Broadway #166, NewYork, NY 10013, United States
Dubai - Office - No 2415, 24th floor, Burjuman Business tower - Dubai, UAE PO Box: 127048
Mail ID- contact@myassignmenthelp.com
Website-https://myassignmenthelp.com/case-study/business-law-case-study.html

Business Law Case Study

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Business Law Case Study

Similar to Business Law Case Study (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Business Law Case Study